New dental scanner could make implant impressions faster and more accurate
NCT ID NCT07320729
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways of taking digital dental impressions for people getting full-arch implants. One method uses a standard intraoral optical scanner, and the other uses a newer photogrammetry scanner. The goal is to see which one is more accurate and faster. Only 4 people are enrolled, so results are very early.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Intraoral Photogrammetry Scanner Elite (Shining3D)
- What this could lead to
- If this works, it could show that photogrammetry is a faster and more accurate way to take dental impressions for full-arch implants.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small study with only 4 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It's also an early-stage trial, so findings are preliminary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DIGITAL IMPRESSION ACCURACY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Assiut University
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71111, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a smartphone replace a dental scanner for implant impressions?
- Digital jaw tracking could make implant dentures fit better and feel more natural
- Dentures vs. implants: which one chews best? new study aims to find out
- Denture upgrade: adding ridges may boost satisfaction
- New dental implants under study to help people with tooth loss
- Which denture teeth last longest? new study puts 3D-Printed to the test