Could a Patient's name or gender tip the ICU admission scale?
NCT ID NCT05513456
First seen Aug 20, 2026 · Last updated Aug 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study asks whether intensive care doctors are unconsciously biased by a patient's gender or ethnicity when deciding to admit them to the ICU. Researchers will send out thousands of identical patient case descriptions, changing only the sex or a name that suggests a particular ethnic background, to see if admission decisions differ. The goal is to uncover any hidden bias in critical care triage.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Randomized case descriptions with varied gender and ethnicity indicators
- What this could lead to
- If bias is found, it could lead to training and policy changes to make ICU admission decisions fairer.
- What could go wrong
- This is a survey study, not a clinical treatment trial, so it won't directly change patient care. Results may not reflect real-world decisions.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 5,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
May 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Intensive care physicians and other physicians working with admission (or non-admission) of critically ill patients across the world are eligible to participate in the study.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: We will include intensive care physicians, both in training and specialists as responders in this randomized survey study Exclusion Criteria: We will exclude "button-mashers", i.e. participating respondents that toggle through the case descriptions faster than they possibly could read the case description. A case answered \<20 seconds will be ruled out.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Critical illness are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Karolinska Institutet
RECRUITINGStockholm, Sweden
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Fluid resuscitation optimization in surgical trauma patients (FROST)
- Tracing of real-time glu13Cose metabolism in human immune cells - intensive care unit
- Can a battery keep ventilators running during ambulance transport?
- Training may cut dangerous complications when ICU patients need breathing tubes
- Could a neck vein check replace a harder ultrasound for ICU fluid management?
- Could stepping down breathing support sooner save more lives?