Hyaluronic acid gel vs standard paste: which calms infected root canals better?
NCT ID NCT07821866
First seen Sep 16, 2026 · Last updated Sep 17, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Researchers compare two medicines placed inside root canals during a two-visit root canal treatment for infected mandibular molars. One medicine is Hyalone, a hyaluronic acid gel, and the other is calcium hydroxide, a standard disinfectant paste. The trial enrolls 24 adults with necrotic pulp and painful apical periodontitis. Participants record their pain for a week after the medicine is placed, and researchers use cone-beam CT scans to check healing around the root tip.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Hyalone, a hyaluronic acid-based gel used as an intracanal medicament
- What this could lead to
- If Hyalone works better, it could offer dentists a new option for easing pain and helping healing during two-visit root canal treatment.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very early, small study with only 24 people, so results may not hold up in larger groups. Root canal treatment can still leave pain or need more visits regardless of the medicament used.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Early phase 1
The earliest testing in people: a first look at safety, in a very small group.
- Participants
-
24 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Apr 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 40 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * • Medically free patients with no systemic disease: (American Society of Anesthesiologists / (ASA Class I or II). * Age range is between 20 to 40 years. * Patients have restorable permanent mandibular first molars (mesial root type III and distal canal type III) that were diagnosed necrotic with symptomatic apical periodontitis with small to moderate periapical lesion less that 5 mm according to CBCT-PAI in highest diameter at any axis in CBCT). * Positive patient's acceptance for participating in the study. * Patients able to sign informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * • Medically compromised patients. * Pregnant or lactating females. * Psychologically disturbed patients. * Patients with a history of allergy to any medication used in the study were excluded. Teeth that have: * Periodontally affected with grade 2 or 3 mobility. * Not restorable teeth. * Abnormal anatomy and calcified canals. * Previous root canal treatment.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Necrotic pulp are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt
Cairo, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New drug tested to curb pain after liver surgery
- Two simple tweaks may cut pain after appendix surgery
- Nerve blocks put to the test for chest tube pain
- Cooling spray takes aim at the sting of an IV
- Heat may boost numbing power of lidocaine for eye shots
- Can a vibrating dolphin toy calm kids during blood draws?