Hip replacement showdown: which surgery gets seniors back on their feet faster?

NCT ID NCT07409909

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two types of hip replacement surgery in active elderly patients who broke their hip. One group received a total hip replacement (replacing the ball and socket), while the other had a partial replacement (replacing only the ball). The goal was to see which surgery leads to better function and recovery. The study included 40 patients aged 65 and older with a specific type of hip fracture.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Total hip arthroplasty (full hip replacement) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (partial hip replacement)
What this could lead to
If this trial shows one surgery is clearly better, it could help surgeons choose the best option for active older patients with a broken hip, leading to faster recovery and better mobility.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with only 40 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The two surgeries have different risks, like infection, dislocation, or need for a second surgery.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Medicine, for Girls, Al-Zhar University, Egpyt

    Cairo, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.