Spinal vs general anesthesia: which is safer for hip fracture patients?

NCT ID NCT07309575

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Lisbon Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at oxygen levels in adults over 65 after hip fracture surgery, comparing regional (spinal) anesthesia to general anesthesia. Researchers will measure oxygen saturation and track complications like sleep apnea, delirium, and hospital stay length. The study is observational, meaning it does not change patient care—it only collects data from routine procedures.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best anesthesia type for older adults with hip fractures to improve breathing and recovery.
What could go wrong: This is a small observational study, not a treatment trial. It only measures oxygen levels and cannot prove which anesthesia is better. Results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENERAL ANAESTHESIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

hip fracture sleep apnea syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

GENERAL ANAESTHESIA HIP-FRACTURE REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Locations

Northern Lisbon Hospital Center
RECRUITING

Lisbon, Lisbon District, 1635, Portugal

Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.