Which sitz bath works best? new trial aims to settle the debate

NCT ID NCT07142382

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will compare three types of sitz baths—ordinary, manual flushing, and electric flushing—in 102 adults recovering from perianal abscess surgery. All participants will bathe in a warm potassium permanganate solution three times daily. The goal is to see which method reduces wound healing time, pain, swelling, and complications like infection or bleeding.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
sitz bath (hip bathing) with 0.02% potassium permanganate solution
What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify the most effective sitz bath method to help people recover faster and with fewer complications after perianal abscess surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with only 102 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Differences between bath types may be small or not clinically meaningful.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIANAL ABSCESS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Putian University Affiliated Hospital

    Putian, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.