Hip scope vs. new hip: which surgery wins for early arthritis?
NCT ID NCT04166227
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two surgical options—hip arthroscopy (a minimally invasive procedure) and total hip replacement—for adults aged 40 to 60 with early hip osteoarthritis. The goal was to see which surgery provides better pain relief and function. However, the trial was stopped early after enrolling only 42 people, so the results are limited.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Hip arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty (surgical procedures)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help determine whether hip arthroscopy or total hip replacement is more effective for managing early hip osteoarthritis in middle-aged adults.
- What could go wrong
- The trial was terminated early with only 42 participants, so results may be inconclusive. As a pilot study, findings are preliminary and may not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
42 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2020
- Finished
-
Apr 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion criteria: 1. Between the ages of 40-60 years at the time of surgery. 2. Radiographic evidence of mild to moderate hip OA (Tönnis Gr 0 with MRI chondral wear, Tönnis Gr 1 and 2). 3. Patients must have completed ≥3 months of non-operative management with ongoing symptoms. Exclusion criteria: 1. Advanced OA, defined as \<2 mm joint space (Tönnis Gr 3) or those with acetabular or femoral head cysts. 2. Patients who are pregnant or may become pregnant around the time of surgery. 3. Prior arthroplasty of the contralateral hip. 4. Current or prior hip dysplasia (defined by a lateral centre edge angle of \<20 degrees). 5. Acetabular protrusio or coxa profunda, making arthroscopic access unsafe/unfeasible.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hip osteoarthritis are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic and University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
-
Fraser Health
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 0E4, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can catching anemia months before joint surgery speed recovery?
- Can a new turkish questionnaire accurately measure hip osteoarthritis?
- Could a 2-Hour online class before hip surgery boost recovery?
- Do screws make hip replacements last longer?
- Ceramic hip resurfacing: a Metal-Free future for joint replacement?
- Can a sedative calm the Body's surgical storm?