Could short bursts of intense exercise boost heart recovery better than steady workouts?

NCT ID NCT07619664

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two supervised treadmill exercise programs for people recovering from coronary artery disease or a heart procedure. One group does high-intensity interval training (HIIT) — short, hard efforts with rest periods — while the other does moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) — steady, moderate exercise. Researchers will measure changes in heart function, walking ability, and cholesterol levels to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT)
What this could lead to
If HIIT proves superior, it could become a standard exercise option in cardiac rehab, potentially improving heart function and fitness more efficiently than traditional moderate exercise.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with 66 participants, so results may not apply to all heart patients. HIIT is intense and may not be suitable for everyone, even with medical clearance.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ch Pervaiz Elahi institute of cardiology Multan.

    Multan, Punjab Province, 60000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.