Small study hopes to find which heart surgery is easier on the body

NCT ID NCT07172529

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at 40 adults having heart surgery to see if a less invasive approach (through a small chest cut) helps preserve lung function and muscle strength better than the traditional method (cutting through the breastbone). Participants will do breathing tests, strength tests, and walk tests before and after surgery. The goal is to understand which surgery type leads to a faster, stronger recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If this study finds that minimally invasive surgery preserves lung and muscle function better, it could guide surgeons to choose approaches that speed up recovery.

What could go wrong

This is a small observational study, not a treatment trial. It only measures differences, so it cannot prove one surgery is better or change practice on its own.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIAC SURGERY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

coronary artery disorder Kinesiophobia Muscle Weakness

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Atilim University

    Ankara, 06830, Turkey (Türkiye)