Gum recession showdown: which membrane works best?

NCT ID NCT07308405

Completed Disease control Sponsor: Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two surgical techniques for fixing receding gums in 50 adults aged 18-35. Both methods used a coronally advanced flap, but one added a platelet-rich fibrin membrane and the other a chorion membrane. The goal was to see which better reduces gum recession and improves gum attachment over 6 months.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane and chorion membrane (CM)
What this could lead to: If one method proves better, it could offer a more effective way to treat receding gums and improve gum health.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed trial with only 50 participants. The results may not apply to everyone, and both procedures are surgical with typical risks like infection or discomfort.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GINGIVAL RECESSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

gingival recession

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

GINGIVAL RECESSION

Contacts and locations

Locations

Department of Periodontics and implantology , Institute of Dental sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.