Gum recession showdown: which surgery works best?

NCT ID NCT07158541

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two surgical techniques—tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF) and modified tunnel technique (MTUN)—both using a small piece of tissue from the palate to cover a single receding gum in the lower jaw. Twenty-four adults will be randomly assigned to one procedure and followed for up to 10 years to see which provides better root coverage and reduces tooth sensitivity.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgical procedure (tunneled coronally advanced flap or modified tunnel technique, both with connective tissue graft)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could become the preferred method for covering receding gums, reducing tooth sensitivity and improving appearance.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures are surgical and carry risks like pain, swelling, or graft failure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GINGIVAL RECESSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Periodontology and Implantology of Ghent University

    RECRUITING

    Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.