Gum recession showdown: which surgery wins for lasting coverage?
NCT ID NCT06940050
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two surgical techniques—coronally advanced flap (CAF) and tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF)—for covering receding gums in the lower front teeth. Both methods use a small tissue graft from the roof of the mouth to support the gum. Researchers will track 34 adults for up to 10 years to see which technique provides better root coverage, reduces tooth sensitivity, and improves appearance.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GINGIVAL RECESSION, LOCALIZED are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Department of Periodontology and Implantology of Ghent University
RECRUITINGGhent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Laser and gel may boost gum graft recovery — trial tests the combo
- Dental thread tested: can a retraction cord protect gums during fillings?
- Could a simple gel speed up gum graft recovery?
- Gum graft showdown: which technique blends best?
- AI reads gum recession from photos: could sharpen dental diagnoses
- Sticky bone may boost gum graft success for receding gums