Gum graft showdown: which material heals better?
NCT ID NCT07111533
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two different materials for gum grafting in 14 adults with stage 3 gum disease. One material came from the patient's own gum tissue, the other from a donor membrane. The goal was to see which helped gums heal better by measuring pocket depth and attachment levels over 6 months.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIODONTITIS (STAGE 3) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of dentistry, Minia University
Minya, Minya Governorate, 61519, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can spit reveal how smoking fuels gum disease?
- Can a gentler Deep-Clean beat standard gum therapy?
- Gel boosts gum healing after deep cleaning for advanced periodontitis — trial puts it to the test
- Collagen supplements could boost standard gum disease therapy
- Timing of gum disease check-ups could change treatment success
- Fish oil and aspirin: a new hope for Smokers' gum health?