Where your gum graft comes from matters: new study compares palate donor sites

NCT ID NCT07554625

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at how gum tissue heals when taken from two different areas of the palate (roof of the mouth) to treat receding gums. Forty healthy adults aged 20-40 had a gum graft taken either from the front or back of the palate. Using 3D scans, researchers measured volume changes at both the graft site and the donor site over 6 months. The goal was to see if one donor area leads to better healing.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help dentists choose the best palate area for gum grafts, improving healing and reducing discomfort.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study focused on measuring healing patterns, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or graft types.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GINGIVAL RECESSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology

    Samsun, Samsun, 55270, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.