Where your gum graft comes from matters: new study compares palate donor sites
NCT ID NCT07554625
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study looked at how gum tissue heals when taken from two different areas of the palate (roof of the mouth) to treat receding gums. Forty healthy adults aged 20-40 had a gum graft taken either from the front or back of the palate. Using 3D scans, researchers measured volume changes at both the graft site and the donor site over 6 months. The goal was to see if one donor area leads to better healing.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose the best palate area for gum grafts, improving healing and reducing discomfort.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study focused on measuring healing patterns, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or graft types.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2023
- Finished
-
May 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 40 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 20 to 40 years (both male and female) * Presence of Miller Class I gingival recession at mandibular anterior teeth (teeth 31, 32, 41, and 42) * Systemically healthy (no known systemic diseases) * Non-smokers * Adequate oral hygiene * Able and willing to provide written informed consent and attend follow-up visits Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy or lactation * Current or past smoking * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus * Use of isotretinoin or similar systemic anti-acne medications * Inadequate oral hygiene * Current anticoagulant therapy * Systemic contraindications to periodontal surgery * History of previous periodontal surgery at the recipient site
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gingival recession are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology
Samsun, Samsun, 55270, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Dimensional changes of autogenous free epithelialized gingival grafts on different bed preparations among dental patients with thin tissue phenotypes: a randomized clinical trial
- Boosting gum grafts: do blood or gel Add-Ons reduce shrinkage?
- Can a new flap technique better cover receding gums?
- A new twist on gum surgery could better cover exposed roots
- Gum graft boost: growth factors may strengthen receding gum repair
- Micro-needling vs. gum graft: a tiny trial tests a simpler fix for receding gums