Spray vs. scrape: which gum cleaning method heals better?
NCT ID NCT07200284
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two deep-cleaning methods for gum disease (periodontitis) in 36 adults: a water-and-powder spray (Airflow®) and traditional hand scraping. Researchers measured gum bleeding, pocket depth, and signs of inflammation in mouth fluid to see which method causes less tissue damage and better healing. The goal is to improve gum disease treatment, not to cure it.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIODONTITIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Granada
Granada, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Blood-Derived clot may regrow bone in gum disease
- Can gum disease be stopped by targeting these genes?
- Could saliva hold the key to understanding gum disease?
- Can a gentler Deep-Clean beat standard gum therapy?
- Could a toothpaste ingredient reshape the microbes behind gum disease?
- Could Stressed-Out gum cells be behind periodontitis?