Tube feeding showdown: which method helps brain injury patients recover faster?

NCT ID NCT06328985

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at 98 people with severe traumatic brain injury who needed a breathing tube. Researchers compared two ways of giving nutrition: a new method called Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding (IOE) versus the standard Nasogastric Tube Feeding. They measured blood nutrient levels, weight, and how quickly patients could have their breathing tube removed over 28 days. The goal was to see if IOE leads to better nutrition and recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding (IOE) vs Nasogastric Tube Feeding
What this could lead to
If one feeding method proves better, it could lead to improved nutrition and faster recovery for severe brain injury patients.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study (98 people) that only looked at short-term outcomes. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Brain Injuries, Traumatic traumatic brain injury

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of rehabilitation medicine, the first ZU hospital north campus

    Zhenzhou, China

  • Department of rehabilitation medicine, the first ZU hospital western campus

    Zhenzhou, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.