Which feeding route cuts pneumonia risk after stroke?

NCT ID NCT06395740

First seen Aug 04, 2026 · Last updated Aug 05, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether stroke patients with bulbar palsy—a condition that makes swallowing difficult—are less likely to develop pneumonia if they receive nutrition through a nasogastric tube or through an IV (total parenteral nutrition). The study will compare the incidence of pneumonia between the two feeding methods over the first 14 days after stroke. It also tracks the need for mechanical ventilation, mortality, and catheter-related infections. The goal is to find a safer way to feed these patients while they recover.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube vs. total parenteral nutrition
What this could lead to
If one feeding method proves safer, it could reduce pneumonia risk and improve recovery for stroke patients with swallowing difficulties.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-phase trial, so results may not apply broadly. Both feeding methods carry risks, including infection or aspiration.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Abdallah Mahmoud Zaki Soudi

    Cairo, 02, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.