Blood test vs. needle biopsy: can a simple draw detect lung cancer mutations?
NCT ID NCT03265496
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at whether a blood test (liquid biopsy) could find EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer patients as accurately as a standard tumor biopsy. Researchers planned to enroll 21 patients with advanced lung cancer who had not yet received treatment. The study was terminated early, so the findings are limited.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a simple blood test (liquid biopsy) can reliably detect EGFR mutations, reducing the need for invasive tumor biopsies.
- What could go wrong
- The study was terminated early with only 21 participants, so results are limited. The approach may not be accurate enough to replace standard tissue biopsy.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for METASTATIC LUNG CARCINOMA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHRU Lille
Lille, 59037, France
-
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, 59020, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a pill keep lung cancer from returning after surgery?
- Aiming to spare lung cancer patients from chemo: a smarter Pre-Surgery plan?
- Can a Two-Target antibody shrink Hard-to-Treat cancers?
- Can extended poziotinib use keep cancer in check?
- Can zapping tumors before surgery boost lung cancer treatment?
- Can a Two-Pronged antibody boost Chemo's power against lung cancer?