ECMO showdown: which strategy saves more lives in High-Risk heart procedures?
NCT ID NCT06274411
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at two different ways to use a heart-lung machine (ECMO) during high-risk heart procedures. One method sets up the machine just in case it's needed, while the other uses it from the start. The goal is to see which approach leads to fewer serious problems like death, heart attack, or stroke. About 176 adults with weak hearts or complex blockages will take part.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 176 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Clinicians decide to perform PCI during ECMO support. 2. Age of ≥18 3. Patient presents with a compromised ejection fraction of less than 35% or at risk of hemodynamic deterioration, or intervention on the last patent coronary conduit or an unprotected left main artery, or complex 3-vessel disease (SYNTAX score of ≥33) 4. Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject in cardiogenic shock(need inotrope, pressor or mechanical support to maintain SBP \>90mmHg) 2. Presence of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency 3. Severe peripheral vascular disease 4. creatinine≥4mg/dL 5. Liver dysfunction with elevation of liver enzymes and bilirubin levels to ≥ 3x ULN 6. History of recent (within 1 month) stroke or TIA 7. Abnormal coagulation(defined as platelet count ≤50000/mm3 or Fibrinogen ≤1.50g/L) 8. Allergy or intolerance to heparin, aspirin, ADP receptor inhibitors, or documented heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ECMO are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
RECRUITINGBeijing, Beijing Municipality, 100029, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a wrist sensor cut the dose of ICU muscle relaxants?
- Can less be more? testing transfusion limits in ECMO
- Can a new heart pump outperform the standard during High-Risk angioplasty?
- New blood thinning combo could cut ECMO bleeding and clotting risks
- New heart pump could replace ECMO in risky angioplasty
- Can a pupil check predict brain recovery? new study tests Super-Early clues in ECMO patients