Digital braces bonding could cut chair time for teens
NCT ID NCT07692880
First seen Jul 09, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways of attaching braces: a digital method using computer planning versus the traditional manual approach. Twenty teenagers needing braces on both upper and lower teeth will receive one method on the top and the other on the bottom. Researchers will measure how long each method takes and how many brackets fall off in the first month.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If digital bonding proves faster and more reliable, it could make getting braces quicker and reduce early breakage.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The techniques may show little difference.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 20 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
12 to 18 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 12 to 18 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment on both upper and lower arches * Presence of full permanent dentition, including erupted second molars Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of dental anomalies in number (supernumerary or missing teeth) in either arch * Orthodontic treatment plans involving tooth extractions in either arch * Nickel allergy * History of cleft lip and/or palate * Craniofacial syndromes
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Malocclusion are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Orthodontic Clinic, Division of Dentistry, Careggi University Hospital
RECRUITINGFlorence, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Tight fit, lasting grip? the torque test for orthodontic anchors
- Can 3D-Printed retainers outlast the Old-School wire?
- Can a tooth-colored, one-visit space saver replace the metal band-and-loop in kids?
- Chewing on a silicone gadget may make clear aligners work better — a trial puts it to the test
- Do clear aligners protect tooth bone better than braces? a head-to-head trial
- Jaw surgery may lift depression along with the bite