Digital vs. goo: which dental mold wins for toothless patients?
NCT ID NCT07190820
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares the accuracy of digital scans versus traditional putty impressions for making dental implants in people with no teeth. About 24 adults aged 30-80 who need full-arch implant-supported bridges will participate. Researchers will check how well the metal framework fits using vision and touch tests.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EDENTULOUS JAW are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Shanghai ninth people's hospital
Shanghai, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New scan ladder technique tested for stronger dental implants
- Phone scans vs. dental scanners: a new contender for implant impressions?
- Jaw bone graft showdown: which material works best for dental implants?
- 3D printed dentures face off against traditional milled ones in new trial
- Digital smile makeover: new implant workflow aims for perfect fit
- Flexible dentures may beat rigid ones for implant fit