Battle of the temporary crowns: 3D-printed vs. milled for instant dental implants
NCT ID NCT07700771
First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 23, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial compares two types of temporary crowns used right after a tooth is pulled and an implant is placed in the front upper jaw. One crown is 3D-printed from resin, the other is milled from a block of PMMA plastic. Researchers will check how well the gums heal and how the final smile looks, aiming to find which temporary crown works best.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- a 3D-printed resin provisional crown or a CAD/CAM-milled PMMA provisional crown
- What this could lead to
- If one crown type proves better, it could improve the look and health of gums around immediate dental implants, leading to more predictable aesthetic results.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial with 60 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or dentists. Both crown types are already in use, so no major breakthrough is expected.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients presenting with non-restorable teeth in the maxillary esthetic zone indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement. * Age ranging from 18 to 50 years. * Adequate interarch relationship and interocclusal space to accommodate the planned prosthetic restoration. * Intact extraction socket walls with a jumping gap not exceeding 4 mm, as measured on preoperative CBCT images. The jumping gap will be defined as the horizontal distance between the implant surface and the inner aspect of the buccal socket wall and will be grafted in all cases. * Good oral hygiene and periodontal health. * Willingness to attend all follow-up visits and comply with study requirements. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of acute infection, pathological lesions, or severe periodontal disease at the planned implant site. * Smokers. * Alcohol or drug abuse. * Patients with systemic conditions contraindicating implant surgery (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders, immunosuppression, recent radiotherapy to the head and neck region). * Pregnancy or lactation. * Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching. * Inability to maintain adequate oral hygiene or attend follow-up visits.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Digital implant dentistry are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a bone graft boost jawbone healing around new implants?
- A custom-shaped healing cap may keep gums and bone in better shape after tooth extraction and implant placement
- Can a new drilling technique make dental implants more stable?
- Custom gum-saving abutment may improve dental implant outcomes
- Liquid bone healer could replace grafts for dental implants
- New bone putty could strengthen dental implants in the smile zone