Battle of the temporary crowns: 3D-printed vs. milled for instant dental implants

NCT ID NCT07700771

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 23, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This trial compares two types of temporary crowns used right after a tooth is pulled and an implant is placed in the front upper jaw. One crown is 3D-printed from resin, the other is milled from a block of PMMA plastic. Researchers will check how well the gums heal and how the final smile looks, aiming to find which temporary crown works best.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
a 3D-printed resin provisional crown or a CAD/CAM-milled PMMA provisional crown
What this could lead to
If one crown type proves better, it could improve the look and health of gums around immediate dental implants, leading to more predictable aesthetic results.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center trial with 60 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or dentists. Both crown types are already in use, so no major breakthrough is expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

60 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Dec 2025

Expected to finish

Jul 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 50 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients presenting with non-restorable teeth in the maxillary esthetic zone indicated for extraction and immediate implant placement. * Age ranging from 18 to 50 years. * Adequate interarch relationship and interocclusal space to accommodate the planned prosthetic restoration. * Intact extraction socket walls with a jumping gap not exceeding 4 mm, as measured on preoperative CBCT images. The jumping gap will be defined as the horizontal distance between the implant surface and the inner aspect of the buccal socket wall and will be grafted in all cases. * Good oral hygiene and periodontal health. * Willingness to attend all follow-up visits and comply with study requirements. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of acute infection, pathological lesions, or severe periodontal disease at the planned implant site. * Smokers. * Alcohol or drug abuse. * Patients with systemic conditions contraindicating implant surgery (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders, immunosuppression, recent radiotherapy to the head and neck region). * Pregnancy or lactation. * Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching. * Inability to maintain adequate oral hygiene or attend follow-up visits.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Digital implant dentistry are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University

    Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.