Back surgery showdown: which procedure works best?
NCT ID NCT06335511
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 50 people with lumbar spinal stenosis to see if simple decompression surgery or a more complex fusion surgery leads to better outcomes. Researchers measured pain, disability, quality of life, and movement using questionnaires and wearable sensors. The goal was to find which patients benefit most from each approach.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzolo
Bologna, Bologna, 40136, Italy
-
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, 40139, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a common hand condition reveal hidden heart disease? new imaging trial investigates
- Belly fat vs. body mass index: which better predicts spine surgery risks?
- Simple tube after spine surgery may cut complications
- New nerve block technique aims to cut opioid use after back surgery
- Less invasive back surgery may be as effective as major revision for spinal stenosis
- Spine surgeons test new CT technique to catch hidden instability during surgery