Denmark ditches dipsticks: will fewer tests mean better care?

NCT ID NCT06750666

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study examines the impact of removing urine dipstick tests for diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in hospitals in the North Denmark Region. Researchers will compare data from before and after the change, looking at UTI diagnoses, antibiotic use, lab tests, and patient outcomes like deaths and readmissions. The goal is to see if stopping this quick test leads to more appropriate care without harming patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that removing a common, often unnecessary test reduces antibiotic overuse and lab costs without increasing patient harm.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so results may be influenced by other changes in practice. It only looks at one region in Denmark, so findings may not apply elsewhere.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Aalborg University Hospital

    Aalborg, 9000, Denmark

  • North Denmark Regional Hospital

    Hjørring, 9800, Denmark

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.