Shorter eye treatment put to the test against standard crosslinking
NCT ID NCT03922542
First seen Sep 17, 2026 · Last updated Sep 18, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Researchers compare two versions of corneal crosslinking to treat progressive keratoconus or corneal ectasia, conditions where the cornea thins and bulges. Both use riboflavin eye drops and ultraviolet light, but one delivers the light faster and more intensely. The trial measures changes in corneal shape and vision to see whether the quicker method works as well as the standard one.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- riboflavin eye drops activated by ultraviolet light
- What this could lead to
- If the accelerated version works as well as the standard one, patients could spend far less time in the treatment chair while still strengthening the cornea.
- What could go wrong
- The accelerated treatment may not harden the cornea as effectively as the standard version, and crosslinking carries risks of infection, haze, or slow healing.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2/3
Runs two stages together: whether the treatment works, then large-scale confirmation.
- Participants
-
508 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2019
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
10 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Documented keratoconus or ectasia after refractive surgery Exclusion Criteria: * Insufficient corneal thickness * Ocular condition that may predispose the eye to complications * History of chemical injury or delayed epithelial healing * Condition that would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing * Known sensitivity to treatment medications * Pregnancy
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ectasia corneal are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Price Vision Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Shorter UV treatment for keratoconus put to the test
- Insulin eye drops put to the test for faster corneal healing
- Eye scans could spot hidden vision risk in down syndrome
- Can a new eye scanner match the gold standard for cataract surgery?
- Can a Light-Based scan reveal the health of your eyes?
- Can a simple eyeglass test sharpen vision in keratoconus?