Heart pacing showdown: new method vs. standard in 6,000 patients
NCT ID NCT06606288
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at real-world data from 6,000 heart failure patients to compare a newer pacing method (conduction system pacing) with the standard method (biventricular pacing). The goal is to see if the newer approach is just as safe and effective at reducing heart failure hospitalizations. The study uses existing medical records, so no new treatments are given.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEART FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Medtronic
Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could delaying kidney implant during heart transplant reduce complications?
- A simple conversation could change how heart failure patients care for themselves
- A picture-based lesson may help heart failure patients spot trouble early
- Can a Two-Drug punch early in hospitalization tame heart failure?
- Bedside flu shot for heart patients: a simple strategy to save lives?
- AI takes on sonographers: a 4,000-Patient trial to sharpen heart imaging