Heart pacing showdown: which method wins for heart failure?
NCT ID NCT06606288
First seen May 02, 2026 · Last updated May 22, 2026 · Updated 4 times
Summary
This study looks at real-world data from 6,000 heart failure patients to compare two types of heart pacing: a newer method called conduction system pacing (CSP) and the standard biventricular pacing (BVP). The goal is to see if CSP is as safe and effective as BVP in reducing complications and hospitalizations. Participants are Medicare beneficiaries who already have a pacemaker.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEART FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Medtronic
Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112, United States
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.