Heart pacing showdown: new method vs. standard in 6,000 patients
NCT ID NCT06606288
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at real-world data from 6,000 heart failure patients to compare a newer pacing method (conduction system pacing) with the standard method (biventricular pacing). The goal is to see if the newer approach is just as safe and effective at reducing heart failure hospitalizations. The study uses existing medical records, so no new treatments are given.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 6,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jan 2017
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The study cohort will include all U.S. Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare implanted with a Medtronic pacemaker between January 1, 2017 and December 1, 2023.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Dual-chamber CSP cohort: * Medicare beneficiaries implanted with a Medtronic dual-chamber transvenous pacemaker on or after the study start date. * Lead type and placement data indicating CSP. * An indication for CRT. BVP comparator cohort: * Medicare beneficiaries implanted with a Medtronic biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P) on or after the study start date. Exclusion Criteria: Dual-chamber CSP cohort: * Evidence of a prior CIED device. * Less than 12 months continuous enrollment in Medicare Part A and Part B prior to implant date. * Non-Medtronic pacemaker (unable to link to Medtronic device registration data). * Missing lead type or placement data. * Lead type and placement data indicating non-CSP placement. BVP comparator cohort: * Evidence of a prior CIED device. * Less than 12 months continuous enrollment in Medicare Part A and Part B prior to implant date. * Non-Medtronic pacemaker (unable to link to Medtronic device registration data). * Missing lead type or placement data.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Heart failure are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Medtronic
Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- The impact of video-based cardiac rehabilitation education in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic Devices(CIEDs)- a randomized controlled trial
- Effect of the use of dapagliflozin in diuresis, natriuresis and in ultrafiltration and peritoneal elimination of sodium, in patients with refractory heart failure
- Can a 10-Week coaching program ease the toll on heart failure caregivers?
- Can a 10-Second chest scan reveal hidden heart clues?
- Can AI help nurses guide At-Risk seniors to better care and lower costs?
- A Body-Scan test may reveal hidden fluid buildup, guiding early diuretic use