New trial pits two key surgeries against each other for Post-Hysterectomy prolapse
NCT ID NCT07174921
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study compares two laparoscopic surgeries—lateral suspension and sacrocolpopexy—for women with vaginal cuff prolapse after hysterectomy. Fifty women will be randomly assigned to one surgery, and researchers will track recurrence, complications, recovery, and satisfaction. The goal is to identify which approach is safer and more effective.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Laparoscopic surgery (lateral suspension or sacrocolpopexy) with synthetic mesh
- What this could lead to
- If this trial succeeds, it could show which surgical technique is better for fixing vaginal cuff prolapse, helping doctors and patients choose the safest, most effective option.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both surgeries carry risks like mesh exposure, infection, or injury.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for POST-HYSTERECTOMY VAGINAL CUFF PROLAPSE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital
RECRUITINGIstanbul, Istanbul, 34494, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.