New implant method may offer better fit for lower dentures
NCT ID NCT03837158
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether using four small, one-piece implants with special attachments is better than the standard two-piece implants for holding a lower denture in place. The goal is to improve comfort and quality of life for elderly people who are unhappy with their current dentures. Researchers will compare patient satisfaction, implant survival, and oral health over one year.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
72 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2019
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2033
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * At patient level: * Written informed consent * Age ≥ 18 years * Sufficient complete dentures (Marxkors and Ferger, 1989) not older than 1 year * Patient is unsatisfied with mandibular denture to the degree that he/she seeks treatment * At site level: * Healed edentulous mandible (minimum 8 weeks since last extraction) * Minimal ridge dimensions 5.5 mm (width) by 12 mm (height) in the anterior (interforaminal) area, allowing the placement of 3.3 (endosseous diameter) by 10 mm (length) implants * Opposing dentition: complete denture on a edentulous maxilla * Physical status (PS) 1 and 2 (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Exclusion Criteria: * At patient level * Any physical or mental disorder that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene or the capability of providing written informed consent and compliance to the protocol * Any disorder that would interfere with wound healing or represent a contraindication for oral surgery such as, but not limited to, uncontrolled diabetes or conditions resulting in or requiring immunosuppression, radiation, chemotherapy, frequent use of antibiotics or antiresorptive medication such as bisphosphonates * Pregnancy or lactation * Heavy smoking habit with \> 20 cig/d * Severe bruxism or clenching habits, present oro-facial pain * At site level: * Ridge defects requiring staged bone augmentation procedures (simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) within the ridge contour allowed)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Dental implants are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Private Practice Dr. B. Wallkamm
Langenthal, Canton of Bern, 4900, Switzerland
-
University of Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Laser etching could give dental implants a stronger gum seal
- Can digital scans beat molds for perfect dental implant fit?
- Which gum graft technique wins for implant health?
- Can ceramic implants replace teeth right after extraction?
- Custom gum-saving abutment may improve dental implant outcomes
- Natural gel could help save failing dental implants