Which arm block spares the diaphragm? new study pits two techniques Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT07386470

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two ultrasound-guided nerve block techniques for hand, wrist, or forearm surgery to see which one causes less temporary diaphragm paralysis. 91 adults were randomly assigned to receive either a costoclavicular or lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. The goal is to help anesthesiologists choose the safer option for patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular nerve block (procedure)
What this could lead to
If one technique causes less diaphragm weakness, it could help anesthesiologists choose a safer nerve block for arm surgeries.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with 91 participants. Results may not apply to all patients or surgeries, and individual responses to nerve blocks vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEMIDIAPHRAGMATIC PARALYSIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

    Ankara, Ankara, 06560, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.