Which filling lasts best? study puts three Tooth-Colored materials to the test

NCT ID NCT06211582

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Hacettepe University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested three different tooth-colored filling materials for cavities on the sides of teeth (Class II cavities). 47 healthy adults received fillings and were checked after 6 months and 1 year. Dentists rated the fillings on appearance, fit, and any problems like staining or cracks. The goal was to see which material works best in everyday use.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: dental filling materials (Cention N, Equia Forte HT, Gradia Direct Posterior)
What this could lead to: If one material performs better, dentists may have a clearer choice for long-lasting, natural-looking fillings.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study with only 47 people. Results may not apply to everyone, and longer-term effects beyond one year are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARIES, DENTAL are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

dental caries

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CARIES, DENTAL

Contacts and locations

Locations

Hacettepe University

Ankara, Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.