Which needle angle wins for back pain? trial tests two techniques Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT03912519

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two ways of performing a procedure called lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic low back pain. One method uses a parallel needle placement with larger electrodes, while the other uses a perpendicular placement with smaller needles. The goal is to see which technique provides better and longer-lasting pain relief in people whose pain comes from the facet joints in the lower back.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
radiofrequency neurotomy (nerve heating procedure)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves superior, it could lead to more effective and longer-lasting pain relief for people with chronic low back pain from facet joints.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage comparison study. Even if one technique works better, results may not apply to all back pain patients, and some people may not respond at all.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BACK PAIN WITHOUT RADIATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Back Pain Low Back Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.