Which needle angle wins for back pain? trial tests two techniques Head-to-Head
NCT ID NCT03912519
First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two ways of performing a procedure called lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic low back pain. One method uses a parallel needle placement with larger electrodes, while the other uses a perpendicular placement with smaller needles. The goal is to see which technique provides better and longer-lasting pain relief in people whose pain comes from the facet joints in the lower back.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- radiofrequency neurotomy (nerve heating procedure)
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves superior, it could lead to more effective and longer-lasting pain relief for people with chronic low back pain from facet joints.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage comparison study. Even if one technique works better, results may not apply to all back pain patients, and some people may not respond at all.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 132 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2019
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * aged \> 40, capable of understanding and providing consent in English, capable of complying with the outcome instruments used, capable of attending all planned follow up visits * unilateral or bilateral low back pain of at least 4/10 on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) present for at least 2 months that has failed to adequately respond to at least 6 weeks of physical therapy and oral pain medication * at least 80% improvement on two consecutive lumbar medial branch blocks of no more than a total of 4 lumbar facet joints * beyond the above stated criteria, the decision to initiate the process of a first medial branch block is based on clinical decision making of the treating physician * Patient consents to treatment in a shared decision-making process with the treating physician. Exclusion Criteria: * Those whose primary complain is lumbar radiculopathy * Those receiving remuneration for their pain treatment (e.g., disability, worker's compensation). * Those involved in active litigation relevant to their pain. * Those unable to read English and complete the assessment instruments. * Those unable to attend follow up appointments * The patient is incarcerated. * History of prior lumbar fusion * Progressive motor deficit, and/or clinical signs of cauda equina or polyradiculopathy * History of lumbar steroid injection (epidural steroid injection, sacroiliac joint steroid injection, lumbar facet steroid injection) within the prior 3 months. * Possible pregnancy or other reason that precludes the use of fluoroscopy. * Allergy to contrast media or local anesthetics. * BMI\>40. * Active Systemic inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, lupus). * Active infection or treatment of infection with antibiotics within the past 7 days. * Medical conditions causing significant functional disability (e.g., stroke, COPD) * Chronic widespread pain or somatoform disorder (e.g. fibromyalgia). * Addictive behavior, severe clinical depression, or psychotic features.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Back pain without radiation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new form of ibuprofen beat standard pain relief for back pain?
- Physical therapy may unlock lasting activity for older adults with joint pain
- Can a video call replace a hospital visit for spine surgery recovery?
- Why does low back pain keep coming back? a study hunts for the warning signs.
- Could short bursts of intense cycling relieve back pain?
- Can a phone app ease the back pain burden on nurses?