Which intubation method keeps heart rate and blood pressure more stable?

NCT ID NCT06487988

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 11, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares two methods of placing a breathing tube during general anesthesia without using opioid painkillers. The goal is to see which method—fiberoptic or direct laryngoscopy—causes less change in heart rate and blood pressure. Researchers will study 90 adults aged 18 to 55 having elective surgery. They will also check how long intubation takes and if patients have sore throat, hoarseness, or airway injury afterward.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If fiberoptic intubation proves more stable, it could guide safer anesthesia practices for patients who cannot receive opioids.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study (90 participants) focused on short-term vital signs, not long-term outcomes. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANALGESICS, OPIOID are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Christian Rouphael

    Beirut, Lebanon

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.