Brain aneurysm showdown: which treatment is safer and cheaper?

NCT ID NCT01811134

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two procedures for treating unruptured brain aneurysms: traditional coiling (using tiny coils to block blood flow) and a newer method using a flow diverter stent. 91 adults with specific types of aneurysms took part. The goal was to see which treatment works better, is safer, and costs less over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

PIPELINE flow diverter stent (device) and detachable coils with or without stent (device)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that the flow diverter stent is a safe and cost-effective alternative to traditional coiling for certain brain aneurysms.

What could go wrong

This is a completed trial with only 91 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both procedures carry risks like stroke or bleeding.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

brain aneurysm intracranial berry aneurysm

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon

    Lyon, BRON, France