Which therapy wins for stroke hand recovery? new trial aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07378774

Recruiting now Symptom relief Sponsor: Zikra Azhar Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two rehabilitation methods—Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Bilateral Training—both combined with electrical stimulation, to see which better improves hand function and reduces muscle tightness in people with chronic stroke. About 94 adults who had a stroke at least six months ago will participate in eight weeks of therapy. The goal is to help doctors choose the best approach for recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Bilateral Training, both combined with Functional Electrical Stimulation
What this could lead to: If successful, this study could show which therapy works best for improving hand movement and reducing muscle tightness in people with chronic stroke.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial with only 94 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The therapies are behavioral and may not work for all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC STROKE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

stroke disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CHRONIC STROKE

Contacts and locations

Locations

Shadman Medical Center
RECRUITING

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.