New study pits CESM against MRI for breast cancer detection

NCT ID NCT05390229

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compared contrast-enhanced mammography (CESM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing suspicious breast lesions in 231 women. Both imaging methods were evaluated against biopsy or surgery results to see which is more accurate. The goal is to determine if CESM could be a reliable alternative to MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If CESM proves as accurate as MRI, it could offer a faster, cheaper, and more accessible diagnostic option for suspicious breast lesions.
What could go wrong
This is a completed diagnostic comparison study, not a treatment trial. Results may show CESM is less accurate than MRI, and findings may not apply to all populations or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

231 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Dec 2018

Finished

Dec 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

All patients referred to the breast clinic at the HSS for a mass suspected of cancer (BIRAD 5) will potentially be considered in the study. These women come either from the Quebec breast cancer screening program, or referred by their attending physician in the investigation of a palpable/symptomatic mass or in an investigation requested for a high-risk patient. These patients will then be referred to us by the attending surgeons as part of the preoperative evaluation of the lesion. Preoperatively, mammography (standard or by tomosynthesis) is considered standard and MRI can also be requested as standard by the surgeon. The patients included will be those for whom an MRI will be prescribed. All patients will receive diagnostic imaging (CESM, MRI and TMN) within 30 days of surgery.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Female aged 18 and over * At least one breast lesion with BIRADS classification 5 Exclusion Criteria: * Refusal to perform the biopsy or surgery * Pregnant or possibly pregnant woman * Usual contraindication to contrast product * Significant kidney failure * Allergy to contrast medium * hyperthyroidism * Usual contraindications to MRI

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Breast cancer are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • St-Sacrement Hospital

    Québec, Quebec, G1S4L8, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.