Which cataract surgery device works better? new study compares two top systems
NCT ID NCT06225362
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This completed study looked at 80 people having routine cataract surgery in both eyes. Researchers compared two different phacoemulsification devices (Quatera 700 and Centurion) to see how they affected corneal thickness and how long it took to remove the lens. The goal was to gather information on which device might offer better outcomes for standard cataract procedures.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CATARACT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple stress ball or favorite tune replace anxiety meds during eye surgery?
- Can a bangkok community eye check reveal hidden glaucoma risks?
- Can trifocal lens implants keep night driving safe and clear?
- Which cataract tool works better? a Head-to-Head test in the same eyes
- Eye scans may forecast lens misalignment after cataract surgery
- Can a stronger eye drop dose shield the retina after cataract surgery?