Which carotid surgery technique is safer? new study reveals early results
NCT ID NCT07288164
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 129 patients who had surgery to clear blocked neck arteries, a common cause of stroke. Doctors compared two surgical techniques—the eversion method and the conventional method—to see which had fewer complications like stroke or artery re-blockage within 30 days. The goal was to find out which approach is safer and more effective in the short term.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATHEROSCLEROSIS OCCLUSIVE DISEASE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which anesthetic shields the brain better during carotid surgery?
- New toolkit aims to fix gender gap in stroke studies
- Race against time: does immediate carotid surgery cut stroke risk?
- New french tool could better measure stroke recovery
- Bystander stories may speed stroke diagnosis
- New combo therapy aims to restore arm movement in stroke survivors