Experts unite to set global standards for medical images
NCT ID NCT07684703
First seen Jul 06, 2026 · Last updated Sep 11, 2026 · Updated 6 times
Summary
This study brings together medical visualization experts from North America, Europe, and South Korea to agree on professional standards for medical images and illustrations. Participants rate and discuss statements about accuracy, accessibility, and ethics over up to three rounds of anonymous surveys. The goal is to create a shared set of guidelines that can improve how medical visuals are made and used in education and healthcare.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could establish widely accepted professional standards for medical images used in education and patient care, improving clarity and trust.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small consensus study with 50 experts, not a clinical trial. The results reflect expert opinion, not proven effectiveness, and may not apply globally.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 50 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The study aimed to recruit a panel of approximately 35-50 experts. As Delphi studies are consensus-based, the target panel size was guided by diversity of expertise, feasibility, and anticipated attrition rather than by a formal power calculation. The recruitment channel involved the principal investigator compiling a roster of domain experts based on program directors or departmental contacts accredited training institutions, with the principal investigator issuing personalized invitations directly. The invitation process followed a standardized email procedure in three stages: (1) Initial invitation: the principal investigator sent a personalized email explaining the study objectives, expected time commitment (approximately 15 minutes per round), the anonymity mechanism, and data protection measures; (2) Follow-up reminder: if the invitee did not respond within 14 days, a first reminder was sent; if there was still no respon.
- Ages
-
27 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Experts were invited from medical illustration training programs or professional associations worldwide. Inclusion criteria required that invitees meet at least one of the following conditions: Inclusion Criteria: * Current faculty or staff at one of the accredited degree-granting institutions in medical and scientific illustration * Current member of a nationally/regionally recognized medical illustration association * Holder of the Certified Medical Illustrator (CMI) credential issued by the Board of Certification of Medical Illustrators * Current visualization editor or supervisor at a high-impact medical journal. * Required to possess at least five years of professional experience in medical visualization or a related discipline * Willing to complete the Delphi questionnaire, having provided informed consent prior to questionnaire commencement. Exclusion Criteria: * Prior participation in the focus group or validity assessment stages of this study's initial questionnaire development * Direct financial interest in commercial AI medical imaging products or related services * Inability to complete the questionnaire in the designated language (English) in the absence of a corresponding language version. Individuals meeting any of the above criteria were excluded to preserve the independence of the consensus process.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Consensus are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.