Which breast reduction method is safer? study compares two techniques

NCT ID NCT04509037

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled This study
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 02, 2026 ยท Last updated Jul 02, 2026

Summary

This study looks back at breast reduction surgeries performed between 2013 and 2019 to compare two methods: one using liposuction with a small incision around the nipple, and the other using longer incisions. Researchers want to see which approach leads to fewer complications, better healing, and higher patient satisfaction. The findings could help surgeons choose the best technique for each patient.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one technique proves safer or more satisfying, it could guide surgeons toward better breast reduction methods.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective review, not a controlled trial, so results may be influenced by patient selection or unmeasured factors.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Started

Aug 2012

Finished

Jun 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients who underwent a breast reduction between 2013 and 2019.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who underwent a breast reduction between 2013 and 2019 * All patients who underwent a liposuction assisted or layered skin incision pedicled technique breast reduction. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who underwent additional procedures simultaneously at the time of the breast reduction.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Breast reductions are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Henry Ford Health System

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.