Arm access showdown: which method is safer for artery procedures?
NCT ID NCT07573644
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two methods of accessing the brachial artery in the arm for treating blocked leg arteries: a needle poke through the skin (percutaneous) versus a small cut (open). About 246 adults will be randomly assigned to one method. The goal is to see which approach causes fewer complications at the access site.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
What this could lead to
If this trial succeeds, it could help doctors choose the safer method for accessing the brachial artery during endovascular procedures, potentially reducing complications.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage comparative study with no direct treatment benefit. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and complication rates could vary.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENTS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
CH de Cholet
Cholet, 49309, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CH de Saint Brieuc
Saint-Brieuc, 22000, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CHD La Roche-sur- Yon
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85000, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CHU Brest
Brest, 29200, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44008, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49100, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, 35000, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Clinique mutualiste porte de Lorient
Lorient, 56100, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Hôpital Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, 75014, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Hôpital privé des Côtes d'Armor
Plérin, 22190, France
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••