New dental fillings put to the test in small study

NCT ID NCT07394751

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares four different dental filling materials in 20 patients with cavities in their back teeth. The fillings are evaluated over 9 months for how well they hold up, look, and affect tooth health. The goal is to see if newer bioactive materials perform better than standard ones.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
dental filling materials (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill, Stela, Cention Forte, Activa BioActive Restorative)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help dentists choose better filling materials that last longer and cause fewer problems.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 20 patients and a short follow-up of 9 months. Results may not apply to everyone or predict long-term performance.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL ADHESIVE MATERIALS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ege University School of Dentistry

    Izmir, Bornova, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.