Which catheter is best for stroke clot removal? new trial aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07085390

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of South Florida Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jul 23, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This study compares two types of catheters used during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a balloon guide catheter and a conventional guide catheter. Researchers want to see if one approach restores blood flow faster and leads to better outcomes. About 100 adults undergoing thrombectomy will participate, and their recovery will be checked at 90 days.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Balloon guide catheter and conventional guide catheter
What this could lead to: If one catheter type proves better, it could become the preferred tool for stroke thrombectomy, potentially improving recovery for many patients.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (100 participants) comparing two standard tools, so results may not be definitive or change practice immediately.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE (AIS) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

ischemic stroke

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE (AIS)

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of South Florida (USF)
RECRUITING

Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
University of Texas Health - Houston
RECRUITING

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.