25-Year back surgery study: when is less really more?
NCT ID NCT07489508
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked back at 25 years of medical records from 246 patients aged 50+ with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing in the spine that can cause leg pain and trouble walking). Researchers compared patients who had a less invasive surgery (tubular decompression, with or without a nerve-blocking procedure) to those who had a more extensive spinal fusion (TLIF). The goal was to see which patients did well with the simpler surgery and which ones later needed fusion. No new treatments were given; the study simply analyzed past data to help guide future surgical decisions.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, 46015, Spain
-
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, 46015, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a common hand condition reveal hidden heart disease? new imaging trial investigates
- Belly fat vs. body mass index: which better predicts spine surgery risks?
- Simple tube after spine surgery may cut complications
- New nerve block technique aims to cut opioid use after back surgery
- Less invasive back surgery may be as effective as major revision for spinal stenosis
- Spine surgeons test new CT technique to catch hidden instability during surgery