Can less be more? new study tests cutting antibiotics in cancer patients with sepsis
NCT ID NCT03683329
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at whether reducing the use of strong, broad-spectrum antibiotics in cancer patients with sepsis or septic shock is as safe as continuing them. The goal is to lower the risk of creating drug-resistant bacteria. Researchers compared a de-escalation strategy to standard antibiotic treatment in 398 patients in intensive care.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Antibiotic de-escalation strategy
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that reducing antibiotic use in cancer patients with severe infections is safe, helping to slow the rise of drug-resistant bacteria.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed trial, but results may not apply to all cancer patients. The strategy might not be as safe as standard care, and individual patient factors could affect outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13273, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A good Night's sleep: could a simple program ease Cancer's toll on rest?
- Can we optimize antibiotic dosing for children with sepsis?
- Could sitting up make radiation therapy more comfortable?
- Can we predict dangerous side effects when combining radiation and immunotherapy?
- Family history as a shield: can culturally tailored guidance cut cancer risk?
- Could starting feeds sooner shield preterm babies from infection?