Ankle surgery showdown: new minimally invasive technique vs. gold standard

NCT ID NCT07200271

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two surgical approaches for chronic ankle instability: a newer arthroscopic technique using donor tissue (allograft) versus the standard open Broström-Gould repair using the patient's own tissue. Researchers will enroll 36 adults with chronic ankle sprains and follow them for one year after surgery to see which method provides better pain relief, function, and safety. The goal is to determine if the newer technique offers real advantages or if both are equally effective.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgical procedure (arthroscopic allograft reconstruction or open Broström-Gould repair)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could lead to improved recovery and fewer complications for people with chronic ankle instability.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial with only 36 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. Both surgeries carry standard surgical risks like infection or nerve damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANKLE SPRAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena

    RECRUITING

    Valdemoro, Madrid, 28342, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.