Pacemaker lead placement: which guidance method works best?

NCT ID NCT07110922

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study compares two FDA-approved methods for placing a pacemaker lead in the Bachmann bundle, a part of the heart. One method uses only contrast dye and X-ray (angiography), while the other adds an electrocardiogram (ECG). Researchers will enroll 50 adults who already need a pacemaker or defibrillator to see which method works better and takes less time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could help doctors choose the best technique for placing pacemaker leads in the Bachmann bundle, potentially improving heart pacing outcomes.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (50 participants) comparing existing methods, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or lead to major changes in practice.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEART DISEASES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

heart disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HEART DISEASES

Contacts and locations

Locations

Geisinger Wyoming Valley
RECRUITING

Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.