Spinal vs. general anesthesia: which is better for kidney stone surgery?
NCT ID NCT07326670
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at 90 adults having kidney stone surgery to see if the type of anesthesia—spinal or general—affects the body's inflammation response. Researchers measured blood markers before and after surgery. The goal is to learn which method might lead to less inflammation and better recovery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Fethi Sekin City Hospital
Elâzığ, Elaziğ, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which procedure wins for dense kidney stones?
- Can a phosphate binder curb kidney stone risk?
- One cut or many? a surgical showdown for complex kidney stones
- Can medical glue replace the drainage tube in kidney stone surgery?
- Which kidney stone procedure works best for dense stones? a Head-to-Head trial
- Antioxidant-rich diets may fight inflammation in type 2 diabetes — a study investigates