Spinal vs. general anesthesia: which is better for joint replacement recovery?
NCT ID NCT06747494
Summary
This study compares two common anesthesia methods—spinal (numbing from waist down) versus general (fully asleep)—for patients getting hip or knee replacements. Researchers want to see which approach leads to better recovery, including less pain and nausea, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications. They will follow about 2,400 patients to measure these outcomes after surgery.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
University of Miami
RECRUITINGMiami, Florida, 33136, United States
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.