Surgery showdown: laparoscopic vs open for swallowing disorder

NCT ID NCT07177222

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 38 people with achalasia cardia, a condition where the esophagus muscle doesn't relax, making swallowing difficult. Half had laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgery and half had open surgery. Researchers measured symptoms and quality of life before and after to see which approach worked better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy (Heller myotomy) and open surgery

What this could lead to

If successful, this study could show that minimally invasive surgery provides similar or better symptom relief with faster recovery for achalasia patients.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with only 38 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. Surgery always carries risks like infection or complications.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACHALASIA CARDIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Esophageal Achalasia idiopathic achalasia

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy

    Bishkek, 720020, Kyrgyzstan