10-Year look at implant infection surgery: which method holds up?

NCT ID NCT07678892

First seen Jul 01, 2026 · Last updated Jul 01, 2026

Summary

This study follows people for 10 years after they had surgery for peri-implantitis, a serious gum infection around dental implants. Researchers compare two surgical approaches: using a bone graft alone versus a bone graft with a resorbable membrane. The goal is to see which method leads to better bone fill and gum health over the long term.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help dentists choose the best surgical method for treating peri-implantitis, improving long-term implant survival.

What could go wrong

This is a small, observational follow-up study with only 16 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It does not test a new treatment.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERI-IMPLANTITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Peri-Implantitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Kristianstad University

    Kristianstad, Kristianstad, 29198, Sweden