10-Year look at implant infection surgery: which method holds up?
NCT ID NCT07678892
First seen Jul 01, 2026 · Last updated Jul 02, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study follows people for 10 years after they had surgery for peri-implantitis, a serious gum infection around dental implants. Researchers compare two surgical approaches: using a bone graft alone versus a bone graft with a resorbable membrane. The goal is to see which method leads to better bone fill and gum health over the long term.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose the best surgical method for treating peri-implantitis, improving long-term implant survival.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, observational follow-up study with only 16 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It does not test a new treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERI IMPLANTITIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kristianstad University
Kristianstad, Kristianstad, 29198, Sweden
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could your bone health decide if a dental implant lasts?
- Can gum disease around implants diminish quality of life?
- Can special alloy rings keep dental implants cleaner?
- Can a light device at home tame implant gum disease?
- Can smoking sabotage dental implants? a deep dive into immune signals
- Could cold plasma save failing dental implants?